Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:54

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Insmed Stock Soars on Experimental Hypertension Drug Trial Results - Barron's
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Resident Evil Requiem: Release Date, Gameplay, And Everything We Know So Far - GameSpot
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why does Rahul Gandhi have so many haters?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Hinge CEO Justin McLeod says dating AI chatbots is ‘playing with fire’ - The Verge
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Is it legal for an employer to ask why you are taking time off from work?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Scientists Just Found the Oldest Barred Spiral Galaxy – And It’s a Monster - SciTechDaily
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.